#Dbx driverack 260 response curve d driver#
#Dbx driverack 260 response curve d software#
#Dbx driverack 260 response curve d plus#

Only downsides are the software can bit a tad finicky and you need to know enough about it all to get it put together. The DLCP is mostly the same brain as the Grimm LS1's.

IMO the math matches the science quite well, you can program the biquads and even AP filters etc.ДЄlso it's hypex so sound quality is excellent.

#Dbx driverack 260 response curve d driver#

So you can measure each driver (or speaker in your case) and then it will model the predicted response as you make changes to the settings. What is great about it's software is it has measurement and prediction built in (it's the HFD v3 you have to ask them for the beta). If you are handy check out the hypex DLCP and its smps. Some digital speaker management systems take digital input, which can be useful if you want to avoid unnecessary ADA conversion. Also he may want to listen to the mains only (sub switched off), in that case the mains HP needs to be switched off too.

#Dbx driverack 260 response curve d plus#

He's got 2 sets of monitors plus a sub, which means switching between the mains may need crossover points to be adjusted accordingly, as well as phase shifting and possibly EQ. I can understand why OP needs a digital crossover in his situation though. Definition of good sound varies from person to person anyways. But all these could have been pracebo thing. Also other engineers I know all agreed that Driveracks degrade sound. I suggested him to replace that with BSS Minidrive which he did, he was happy with the improvement. He wanted to improve his soundsystem without changing the whole rig, then I saw 260 used as a crossover/EQ. This guy who runs a small club once consulted me when I was working as a freelance sound engineer. It just happens to be one of the gear I would avoid if possible. On another note, have you compared Driverack260 with other digital crossovers like XTA, BSS or Lake and saying that Driverack260 doesn't degrade sound? If that's what your ears tell, it's all good. Aslo thought that NS-10 would roll off gradualy as it's a sealed-box design while A7 would have steeper HP curve becuase of bass-reflex cabinet. I have no experience with neither monitors but I always hear people saying NS-10 have hardly anything below 100hz whereas Adams roll off around 45hz on spec. NS-10 and A7 roll off around the same frequency? I didn't know about that. I routinely use sound systems with the DBX Driverack 260s (and occasional 4800s) on corporate level shows and they sound just fine. The specs might say differently, but in your room you would have to spend A LOT of money to make the low freqs. Those speakers are going to roll off at close to the same point anyways. Just use the sub's crossover (is it variable at all?) To be honest, I wouldn't use a crossover in this situation. While I didn't pipe the entire program through the thing I did use it for the sub harmonic boost/synth feature and other things.

I used to have a Driverack 260 and I used it for different things in my studio. the Lake LM-26 processors are good, but are you really going to spend $2400.00 for a crossover to do this job? The standard is very high because the people are spending a lot of money.Д«ut, yeah. When using them for distribution amps we are feeding everything from multi-thousand dollar video recording rigs to satellite and internet broadcast feeds. We use the 260s for everything from crossovers to distribution amplifiers. The average show's budget dwarfs the budget even the biggest record project. If there was any serious degradation of the sound I don't think that the companies that do these shows would be using them.

Avoid dbx Driverack! Never tried 4800, but all other units come with bad converters which degrades sound at very noticable level.Hmmmmm.